Skip to content.
|Networking government in New Zealand.
 
You are here: Home » Standards » Metadata (NZGLS) » NZGLS Working Group - Meeting 22 September 2004 » 3. Review of Action Points from previous meeting

3. Review of Action Points from previous meeting

1. John to put out a more structured email for comment, on how the portal can make better use of NZGLS. Carried over from previous meeting. [From WG meeting 6 Dec 2002 Item 9]

Overtaken by Portal Strategy.

2. Baz to send links to overseas examples of web training to David. [From Item 4.4]

Done.

3. David to send out analysis of training responses to the Working Group. [From Item 4.4]

Done.

4. Discuss, at future meetings, the development of supplementary industry/sector thesauri, the appropriate relationship to NZGLS and mapping to show hierarchies. [From Item 5.2]

Carried over.

5. John to follow up additional NZGLS Working Group membership with Doug Mercer re: education sector. [From Item 6]

Carried over.

6. Working Group members to forward membership suggestions to John by 31 May 2004. [From Item 6]

Suggestions received, especially regarding the health sector. John raised the lack of Maori representation. This has previously been discussed with Te Roopu Whakahau, but they currently are more concerned with the Maori subject headings initiative. Gillian gave John an article from Library Life on the translation of DC elements into Maori. Victoria noted that Maori presence on portal would be dealt with in the Portal Strategy.

Action: John to follow up the status of the DC translation into Maori with Karen Rollitt.

7. John to draft a policy formalising NZGLS Working Group membership processes. [From Item 6]

Done.

8. John to send Terms of Reference for the NZGLS Working Group to chief executives along with the letters to confirm membership. [From Item 6]

Not yet sent out.

9. John to email out questions surrounding Service Type. [From Item 7]

Sent 20 May 2004

10. John to discuss the possibility of developing a document type encoding scheme with Archives' colleagues. [From Item 7]

Not possible in the short term.

11. John will complete the draft document describing what each element means when describing a service, and circulate. [From Item 8]

Sent 1 Sept 2004

12. Karen to look at the MARC Contributor role list and come back with an appropriate subset. Karen to talk to Victoria about current usage, of Contributor, in Metalogue. [From Item 9.3]

Done.

13. Karen also to look at whether there are Contributor roles which are service related. [From Item 9.3]

Done.

Action: Everyone to carry over discussion about Contributor roles electronically.

Action: Victoria to talk to Karen about application of suggested Contributor list to portal.


[ Previous | Next ]