SecureMail - Agency
|
Providing a means for people and government agencies to exchange information electronically. Government agency informationTo print the information on this page, download the file: PDF [212 KB] or Word [536 KB]. The Case for SecureMailSecureMail allows IN-CONFIDENCE email communication to occur between agencies, businesses and people. This enables information to be communicated that could not previously be sent over the Internet. Using SecureMail contributes to the achievement of the e-government outcomes of Convenience and Satisfaction, Integration and Efficiency, and Participation, because:
For an agency, the value proposition for providing SecureMail is anticipated to be: Convenience SecureMail will be an easier way for agencies, businesses and people to send a message, where previously they have used letters and other channels because of security concerns. Some message types that are expected to use SecureMail include:
Automation of tasks SecureMail will help enable the development of new transactional applications. Processing of structured messages (such as invoices) can be integrated with business applications, potentially reducing the time staff spend on routine tasks. Improved Service for customers SecureMail offers several opportunities for an agency to improve service:
SecureMail SystemThe diagram below demonstrates how the SecureMail system will work for an agency. For simplicity, multiple instances of each organisation are not shown. On the left, it shows a government agency using its own Gateway to send/receive SecureMail messages over the Internet. On the right, the diagram shows three types of receivers: On the bottom right, a Gateway Service Provider provides a Gateway to a Mail Service Provider, who in turn provides mail store services to lots of people and small organisations. In addition, the Gateway Service Provider offers a gateway service to medium organisations with their own mail store. On the top right, the diagram shows a Gateway/Mail Service Provider providing both Gateway and mail store services to many people and small organisations. On the middle right, the diagram also shows how a large organisation can use its own Gateway to send/receive secure messages over the Internet, without any service provider intervention. One configuration option for SecureMail is to only have a single government Service Provider. Effectively, this option would require the establishment of a centralised all-of-government webmail service. This option is not currently being considered, but is included for completeness.
SecureMail deployment - an overviewBefore deploying SecureMail, an agency will need to consider: Generic government topics: There will be a number of generic government legal and business topics that will apply to any agency. There are SecureMail documents available that provide detailed analysis from an all-of-government perspective; Topics specific to an agency: An agency will have legal and business topics specific to it, for reasons such as the enabling legislation under which it operates; Business processes: An agency’s business processes may need to be re-designed to work with SecureMail; Technical architecture: An agency’s technical architecture may need to be reconfigured to work with SecureMail. To use SecureMail, an agency will need to organise access, by installing its own Gateway, contracting the service from a Gateway Service Provider or obtaining a SecureMail mailbox from a Mail Service Provider. Note: Many agencies have an existing SEEMail Gateway that can be upgraded or duplicated to provide SecureMail functionality. OPTION 1: Own Gateway: An agency requiring its own Gateway will need to:
OPTION 2: Contracted Gateway: An agency can use the service of a Gateway Service Provider. The Gateway Service Provider will impose SecureMail requirements for security and interoperability on the agency. OPTION 3: Obtaining a SecureMail mailbox: An agency can obtain a SecureMail mailbox from an accredited SecureMail service provider. Note: Some agencies may already have an ISP that is an accredited SecureMail service provider, in which case, their ISP may be able to upgrade their mailbox to a SecureMail mailbox. To deploy SecureMail, an agency will need to:
To operate SecureMail, an agency will need to: Continue to comply with SecureMail requirements: An agency is already responsible for maintaining security (SIGS) and interoperability (e-GIF) in accordance with Government standards mandated by Cabinet. Where an agency has its own Gateway, deploying SecureMail will also place an obligation on an agency to undertake regular testing of their Gateway and to upgrade their Gateway in a timely fashion, as amendments to the SecureMail requirements are notified. Business topics to considerBefore deploying SecureMail an agency will need to consider how SecureMail will impact on its business processes. Some of the topics that need to be considered are outlined below. The topics fall into three categories:
Topics relating to SecureMail for dealing with businesses and peopleChannel strategy SecureMail is just one of a range of emergent communication technologies, such as SMS and digital TV, that need to be aligned with existing online and offline service delivery channels. Structured messages can be integrated with business applications to allow for automated processing, thereby improving efficiency. An agency must ensure information received in any format, is managed so it continues to be accessible over time. Verify SecureMail address Existing clients who wish to use SecureMail to communicate with an agency will have to go through a process to change their contact information (from a postal address, to an email address). An agency may require the mailbox holder to identify him or herself to a level sufficient for a particular type of transaction to be carried out, such as providing a form of photo ID. The mailbox holder’s Mail Service Provider might choose to provide a service to simplify this process. Client accountability SecureMail does not identify the person who sent the email – it authenticates the FROM: address. Some clients may share a SecureMail email address. In some cases, depending on the nature of the transaction, an agency may require the client to acknowledge they are the only person using the mailbox (ie it is not a mailbox to which other people have access). The client’s Mail Service Provider might choose to provide a service to simplify this process. An agency may require strong authentication, to give a higher assurance of accountability - such an agency will have to assist clients who require this. Staff obligations Staff are responsible for all authorised use of a SecureMail mailbox. It is important to safeguard access to the mailbox and do not share it. If the SecureMail mailbox is used for high value or high-risk transactions, then a more secure form of authentication, other than username/password, may be necessary. Value added services An agency is free to develop value-added services as they see fit. Such services must not compromise SecureMail. In some situations, such as developing structured message formats, then an agency will be encouraged to develop standards for the whole of New Zealand. Service level expectation The Internet has raised service level expectations about messages. Customer expectations need to be carefully managed to ensure realistic targets for things such as response times. An agency may need a quality assurance process to ensure consistent style and content in communications sent via paper mail, and those sent via SecureMail. Because people and business may find it easier to send emails than to write letters, the volume of correspondence may grow. This growth may highlight or exacerbate problems with existing business processes or infrastructure. Prioritisation of SecureMail An agency may prioritise SecureMail messages (which are likely to have a very low junk email ratio because of the authentication of the sender’s email address) over non-SecureMail messages, to deal with the increasing volume junk mail. Support resources An agency will need to consider what extra information and support its staff and customers need to use this new technology. For instance, it may have to advise its customers not to access SecureMail through insecure public access points, unless they can use strong authentication. Delivery receipt SecureMail will return a delivery receipt if requested. This indicates the message has been successfully delivered, unlocked and verified by the organisation responsible for handling the receiver’s messages. This feature is not a read receipt – for an important transaction, the business may have to request an acknowledgement from the receiver, that the message has come to the recipient’s attention. Topics related to having a GatewayContact information An agency will need generic contact information, kept up-to-date with the SecureMail administrator. This information cannot contain personally identifiable information, but rather < securemailadmin@agency.govt.nz > and a phone number. Gateway obligations An agency running their own Gateway will be expected to maintain compliance with the SecureMail interoperability and security requirements They will require staff with experience in the operational issues that arise if message encryption fails. For example, if a Gateway fails, then until a new Gateway is implemented, all the arriving encrypted messages cannot be delivered. A significant upstream queuing facility may be required to store incoming messages. If the agency’s decryption key is lost, then messages are useless – there must be a robust process to ensure the key is backed up securely and available in a timely fashion when required. Sovreignty An agency must ensure SecureMail messages are protected for the public interest and to preserve personal privacy. To ensure New Zealand laws protect SecureMail messages, An agency will not be able to use facilities outside of New Zealand to handle SecureMail, i.e. an agency is only allowed to store messages in New Zealand and send messages over the New Zealand part of the Internet. Mail server obligations An agency must ensure that any SecureMail message it sends, has an authenticated FROM: address and can be linked to an accountable sender. SecureMail has minimum standards for authentication. An agency must support username/password access to a mailbox. An agency with SEEMail should already comply with this obligation. Online authentication It is expected that any authentication mechanism used within SecureMail will be consistent with the Best Practice Framework for Authentication. Topics relating to providing SecureMail for personal use, staff and contractorsPersonal use An agency will need to determine how its employees and contractors will use SecureMail. For example, an agency may allow SecureMail for personal use. In such situations, it is recommended a separate mailbox/email address be used e.g. myname@personaluse.agency.govt.nz AND that information be categorised with [PERSONAL]. Legal topics to considerBefore deploying SecureMail an agency will need to consider how SecureMail will impact on it from a legal perspective. Some of the all-of-government legal topics that need to be considered are outlined below. Electronic transactions An agency will need to:
Access to information As with any official communication, SecureMail messages and associated information, such as operation logs, will be subject to Archives Act, Official Information Act and Privacy Act obligations. Crimes If an interception, copying, accessing or interference offence is committed in relation to SecureMail messages or the associated SecureMail environment, an agency should take the appropriate action. Human rights An agency that deploys SecureMail must continue to provide alternative communication channels. Employees/Contractors An agency must ensure that obligations are imposed on employees and contractors through agreements. Some topics to consider include ensuring that they:
Liability An agency needs to consider ways in which liability from the use of SecureMail can be mitigated. Situations in which liability could arise include such things as security breaches, misuse of the system by authorised people and failure to perform an agreed action. Complementary approaches to SecureMailOver time, other complementary approaches may emerge, which enable the secure exchange of email from government to businesses and people. Distributed Government WebmailSome agencies already provide a limited form of email service between themselves and their clients. E.g. IRD’s Secure Correspondence. The typical approach is to implement a webmail interface to the agency’s systems. As a complementary approach to SecureMail, those agencies that provide webmail interfaces to their systems could allow their clients to use send emails to other agencies via their SEEMail gateway. Because SecureMail also uses SEEMail gateways, should agencies adopt this approach there are unlikely to be any integration issues. Agencies would ideally need to develop an e-GIF standard(s) to ensure greater consistency in the messaging system used by the client. Increase the use of existing emailAgencies may also wish to make more use of the existing Internet email service for the exchange of secure email from government to businesses and people. Anecdotally, many people already ask agencies to email their personal information to them, however agencies often state that because email is insecure they can only send their personal information by postal mail. On closer inspection, such practices appear to have developed in the absence of any analysis of the risks involved. The government’s security policy, Security in Government Sector (SIGS), states that agencies are responsible for ensuring information is adequately safeguarded. It notes that security decisions must be formulated on a sound factual, financial, lawful and ethical basis, based on an assessment of risk. The key risks in using the existing Internet email service are:
SIGS states that username/password and encryption should be considered, (i.e. it is not mandatory), for transmission of IN CONFIDENCE information across the Internet. Agencies that undertake a risk assessment may discover opportunities for using existing Internet email services to send some types of IN-CONFIDENCE information. Implementing additional checks and balances may increase opportunities even further. Back to top |


