Framework overview
Services List Framework Approach
The framework for services modelling has been developed based on the Unisys e-Strategy and SYSDOC's Chart, Challenge and Change methodologies [ Unisys e-Strategy methodology is part of the Unisys TEAMmethod, which is a registered service mark of Unisys Corporation] [SYSDOC Chart, Challenge and Change Methodology, Registered 2001]. The Services List will be undertaken in four stages as shown below:
Introduction
The tasks and activities described in this framework are intended for guidance purposes. As agencies are at different stages in their services lifecycle there may be a need to modify steps in the process. The approach can be customised to meet each agency's requirements. For example, if an agency already has a well-established electronic services direction and online service delivery plan, the approach could be used as supplied.
The deliverables from this exercise, however, will remain as standard as possible to ensure that there is a capability for comparison across agencies.
Stage 1: Scoping & Mobilisation
The aim of this stage is to gain Agency acceptance of the purpose and importance of this project and a commitment of resources by the Agency to collect service data. It is during this stage that the Agency takes a high-level review of its current online service delivery capabilities and plans for e-services. This enables a Terms of Reference (TOR) to be developed and signed between the Agency sponsor and the agency to move to the next stages.
Stage 2: Services Definition/Description
The purpose of this stage is to collect service descriptions from each of the agencies and to collate them into a common inventory. The EGU Project team will provide training and facilitation to support the agency projects collecting this data.
Stage 3: Customer Services Grouping
The purpose of this stage is to analyse the data collected in Stage 2. Services will be grouped from a user-focused viewpoint. Preliminary services opportunities will be identified by looking for commonalities across service users, services and delivery channels.
Stage 4: Implement
The purpose of this final stage of the process is to finalise the service inventory and make the data available through the E-government portal. This stage will involve ensuring the accuracy of the information collected and developing a process to ensure the currency of the data on an ongoing basis.
Stage 1 : Scoping and Mobilisation (SM)
Description
The aim of this stage is to gain Agency acceptance of the purpose and importance of this project and a commitment of resources by the agency to collect service data.
In order to collect valid and consistent data from each of the agencies, an agreement in the form of a Terms of Reference (TOR) will be signed between the Agency Sponsor and each government agency.
The main purposes of this stage is to:
-
Agree the scope and timeline for this project
-
Get executive sponsorship within the agency
-
Get approval for agency funding and resource allocation for development of the services list.
The key inputs for this phase include:
-
Environmental assessment of New Zealand and international online governmental services in the agency's area of interest.
-
A standard Service List Project TOR that is used as a starting point for a customised TOR.
-
A standard set of service definitions for the agency service context.
-
The Service User and Stakeholder Service Model description
The outputs for this phase include:
-
Agency Executive approval to the Services List project.
-
Agency co-ordinator and co-ordinators are identified and assigned to the project.
-
An EGU e-Services Project team member is assigned as the primary contact for the agency.
Deliverables
1. Preliminary Assessment of the Agency’s service portfolio
-
Description: A summary of those services being provided, planned or proposed based on an agency review of its current operations and plans and the target service user/stakeholder groups.
-
Format: A report generated from the Services List Database.
2. Signed TOR for agency
-
Description: An agreement between the Agency and EGU about the approach and resources to be committed to the collection and documentation of a services list.
-
Format: A customised version of the generic Agency TOR.
3. Preliminary workplan.
-
Description: High-level description of tasks and agreement on specific staff resources devoted to these tasks and timeframes. This is a direct input into the Agency TOR.
-
Format: A high-level project plan (Microsoft Project).
Stage 1: Scoping & Mobilisation Stage (SM): Tasks/Resources
|
Task ID |
Task Type |
Task |
Description |
Team |
Templates Available |
|
SM-1 |
Research & Analysis |
Review online services in the same agency - NZ and overseas |
Objective: To provide a benchmark for comparing the Agency's service profile against. Description: This review is conducted by the Agency and the EGU project team mainly through Web searches and contact with equivalent governmental groups within the U.S., U.K and Europe. Activities:
|
EGU project team/ Agency |
e-Readiness Assessment |
|
SM-2 |
Data Gathering |
Review agency web site, online service delivery plans & current projects. |
Objective: To identify sources of services information within the agency and the ease of using them in order to factor realistic data into decisions about the size and effort required to develop the data necessary for the Service List project. Description: This review is conducted by the Agency mainly through collecting the following information:
Activities:
|
Agency / EGU |
|
Task ID |
Task Type |
Task |
Description |
Team |
Templates Available |
|
SM-3 |
Data Gathering |
Review current service delivery operation |
Objective: To develop a high-level "picture" of service delivery within the agency in order to provide initial guidance about where to focus data collection. Description: Based on the information collected in the prior task, the agency takes a first cut at understanding its service delivery operational issues and performance. Activities:
|
Agency/EGU |
|
|
SM-4 |
Sign Off |
Develop TOR for agency |
Objective: Reach a formal agreement on the project to be run by the Agency to collect service list information. Description: Creating the Agency TOR based upon the generic Agency TOR and the information gathered in steps SM1-SM3. Activities:
|
EGU/Agency teams |
Generic Agency TOR |
|
SM-5 |
Sign Off |
Gain Executive Commitment for Services List |
Objective: Agency management is willing to support the project and own the results. Description: Commitment means that Agency senior management will support and drive the the project. Activities:
|
Agency Manager / EGU Manager |
Generic Agency TOR |
Stage 2 : Services Definition and Description
Description
The purpose of this stage is to collect service descriptions from each of the agencies and collate them into a common inventory. The EGU project team will play the role of trainer and facilitator in support of the agency project staff collecting this data. The service data collected at this stage will be the basis for the remaining two stages. An interim service data collection tool called the Service List Database, will be used to capture the data.
The key inputs for this phase include:
-
The Agency TOR
-
Agency team Training materials
-
The standard set of service definitions
-
Preliminary workplan
-
The Service User and Stakeholder Service Model description
-
Agency/cluster Environmental Report
The outputs for this phase include:
-
Trained agency co-ordinators
-
Detailed Workplan for the agency project
-
List of services currently in place, planned, or proposed.
-
Service descriptions written according to NZGLS meta-data standards
-
Service pack definitions and descriptions
Deliverables
1. Trained agency co-ordinators
-
Description: Selected agency staff are fully familiar with the Service Delivery Models, service definitions, and techniques for service descriptions.
-
Format: Workshop with an EGU project team member.
-
Description: Fully detailed project plan identifying tasks, resources and timeframes for collection of services data from the agency.
-
Format: Gantt chart with activities, effort and resources identified.
-
Description: A list of current, planned and possible services that the agency could provide.
-
Format: Report from the Service List Database.
4. Service description per NZGLS meta-data standards
-
Description: The list of services fully catalogued in a standard format and with standard definitions.
-
Format: Report from the Service List database.
5. Service pack definitions & descriptions
-
Description: All of the supporting material that is currently in place or has been suggested for the service descriptions.
-
Format: Copies of this current supporting material.
Stage 2: Service Definition & Description (SD): Tasks & Resources
|
Task ID |
Task Type |
Task |
Description |
Team |
Reference to templates |
|
SD-1 |
Training |
Train Co-ordinators |
Objective: Train agency staff to be able to carry out the Service List project. Description: EGU provides training to selected agency staff in the Service Definitions, how to use the Service List Database etc. so that they can start collecting services data. Activities: 1. Conduct a training session for selected agency staff where:
2. Practice the development of:
|
EGU Business Analyst; Agency co-ordinators |
Users Guide; Co-ordinator's Guide; Service Definitions; Service List Database |
|
SD-2 |
Report |
Develop Detailed Workplan |
Objective: To set out the sequence of tasks to complete the project on time and budget. Description: The Agency refines the preliminary workplan with additional tasks and/or sub-activities that were not identified in the initial planning. Activities:
|
Agency PM; EGU project manager |
Generic Project Plan |
|
Task ID |
Task Type |
Task |
Description |
Team |
Reference to templates |
|
SD-3 |
Workshop |
Conduct Services Definition Workshop |
Objective: To identify and document the full range of services being offered, planned or proposed by the agency. Description: The EGU Lead Consultant facilitates a workshop with agency people explaining the kinds of information required to document current, planned and possible agency services. The workshop could include the following elements:
Activities: 1. The agency co-ordinator identifies who within the agency should participate in this workshop. 2. The agency co-ordinator customises presentation material to meet the needs of the workshop. 3. EGU facilitates the workshop during which:
4. The results of the workshop are documented and the Service List database is updated. |
Agency Co-ordinator; Agency people; EGU Business Analyst |
|
Task ID |
Task Type |
Task |
Description |
Team |
Reference to templates |
|
SD-4 |
Report |
Describe Services |
Objective: To fully document and categorise all the agency services. Description: The Agency project team documents all the services identified in the workshop and from any follow-on events (e.g. further workshops, interviews, discussions, etc.). These services will be described using the Service List database or data collection templates. Activities: 1. From the initial list of services compiled in the workshop do the following:
2. Take the more detailed information and enter it into the relevant templates/fields of the Service List Database. |
EGU Lead Consultant; Agency staff |
Service List Database forms. |
|
SD-5 |
Report |
Refine Service Packs |
Objective: Identify all resources required for the service being provided by the agency. Description: The agency project team identifies and documents all of the collateral (e.g. fact sheets, brochures, systems, forms) that the agency has available for current and planned services. Activities:
|
Agency staff; EGU Business Analyst |
Stage 3: Customer Services Grouping
Description
During this stage the agency data is analysed to produce the opportunities to build or enhance online services.
The focus of this stage is to group services from the point of view of the user (e.g. citizen or stakeholder). This analysis will result in detailed descriptions of the services data that can be translated, in the next stage, into information that will be integrated into the New Zealand Government Portal.
The grouping process will identify service integration opportunities by looking for commonalities across service users, services and delivery channels.
The key inputs for this phase include:
-
List of services currently in place, planned, or proposed.
-
Service descriptions written according to NZGLS metadata standards
-
Service Pack definitions and descriptions
The outputs for this phase include:
-
A first-cut list of opportunities for e-government services.
-
A process map showing the linkages between service user groups, delivery channels and agency services.
Deliverables
1. List of service users and opportunities to add value
-
Description: A list of opportunities ranked by the likely value-add to users of government services. This list will include all services - not just those most likely to be e-enabled.
-
Format: Report from the Service List Database.
2. Preliminary life-event and service user segment grouping from agency's user definition
-
Description: A mapping showing the relationships between service users and life-events.
-
Format: Graphical chart with explanatory text.
3. Preliminary online service opportunities for the agency.
-
Description: A list of recommendations from the EGU project team to SSC about the most value-add services to focus attention too.
-
Format: A prepared report from EGU.
Stage 3: Customer Services Grouping (CSG): Tasks & Resources
|
Task ID |
Task Type |
Task |
Description |
Team |
Reference to templates |
|
CG-1 |
Report |
Review Services List |
Objective: Ensure there are no gaps/inconsistencies in the data collected about services from the agency. Description: The EGU project team member will review the data stored in the Service List Database to ensure it is:
Activities:
|
Agency co-ordinator/ EGU project team member |
Service List database. |
|
CG-2 |
Workshop |
Identify service users and service delivery issues. |
Objective: Identify and document common features and/or issues in the services being provided or planned by the agency. Description: The Agency project team and the EGU project team representative will review the data collected and stored in the Service List Database to identify commonalities in:
Activities:
|
Agency people; EGU project team member. |
|
Task ID |
Task Type |
Task |
Description |
Team |
Reference to templates |
|
CG-3 |
Workshop |
Map processes at a high level. |
Objective: To make it easy to see the linkages between service users, services, and delivery channels. Description: Based on the linkages identified in the prior steps, a high-level process map will be created to graphically demonstrate these linkages. Focus will be on service user/agency and agency/agency interactions to deliver a service. Activities: 1.The Agency project team will develop a high level process map (or Channel Matrix [ A Channel Matrix is a table showing Services down one side and Delivery Channels across with various symbols used in the connecting cells to show the nature of the link between the service and the delivery channel.]).
2. The Matrix will be annotated and text provided to describe the chart. 3. The Matrix will be approved by the appropriate selected agency manager. |
EGU project team |
|
|
CG-4 |
Workshop |
Group Services from a service user point of view. |
Objective: To translate the data collected about services into a view from the service user/ stakeholder point of view so as to identify opportunities and issues. Description: Using the process map, the Agency project team will be able to identify those services most likely to have the largest impact upon the user. Also by using the process map, the Agency team will be looking for the relationship between "service user life-events" (e.g. birth, unemployment) and the multiple services and delivery channels that usually are involved. Activities:
|
Agency project team/ EGU project representative |
Service user & Stakeholder Service Delivery Model |
|
Task ID |
Task Type |
Task |
Description |
Team |
Reference to templates |
|
CG-5 |
Workshop |
Identify preliminary online opportunities. |
Objective: To get a preliminary view of the potential for electronic service delivery in agencies. Description: These services will be reviewed and assessed against criteria such as:
Assessment against these criteria should lead to a natural priority ranking of online opportunities. Activities:
|
Agency project team/ EGU project representative |
Stage 4: Implement
Description
The purpose of this final stage of the process is to finalise the service list to make the data available through the E-government portal. This stage will involve ensuring the accuracy of the information collected and developing a process to ensure the currency of the data when the project is completed.
The services available from the New Zealand Government Portal will be a mixture of informational (e.g. advice on where to get an application form) and direct (e.g. online forms). The Services List will be integrated into the New Zealand Government Portal thereby making the portal more useful to government service users and stakeholders.
The key inputs for this phase include:
-
Approved Service List from each agency.
The outputs for this phase include:
-
A working set of services and definitions on the New Zealand Government Portal
-
A process for maintaining the currency and accuracy of the service information on the New Zealand Government Portal.
Templates & Tools
-
Service List Database
Deliverables
1. Final service meta-data description
-
Description: Agency signed off service meta-description document
-
Format: Reports generated from the Service List database.
2. Service descriptions on the New Zealand Government Portal
-
Description: Any user of the New Zealand Government portal can retrieve information (or link directly to) services and resources that have been included.
-
Format: The Prototype New Zealand Government Portal.
3. Service meta-data maintenance process
-
Description: An agreed process by which the agency maintains its own information about its services on the New Zealand Government Portal.
-
Format: Process document developed by the agency for maintaining their meta-data in the New Zealand Government Portal.
Stage 4: Implement (IM): Tasks & Resources
|
Task ID |
Task Type |
Task |
Description |
Team |
Reference to templates |
|
IM-1 |
Sign-Off |
Review and finalise services list |
Objective: Ensure that the Agency provides final sign-off that all of the services information collected by the Agency and compiled by EGU is accurate and complete. Description: The EGU project team will request sign-off by the relevant agency that the data recorded about its services is accurate and current. Activities: 1. The agency data is produced from reports out of the Service List database for final sign-off by a designated Agency senior manager. 2. Handover to the Portal project team. |
EGU project manager; Agency co-ordinator; Portal Project Manager |
Service List Database |
|
IM-2 |
Report |
Plan to integrate Service List information into portal |
Objective: Seek agreement for adoption of the collected service data to be put into the prototype New Zealand Government Portal by the Portal project team. Description: A project plan will be developed by the EGU project team working with the Portal team to feed the services data into the Portal structure. Activities:
|
Portal Project Team |
Portal project meta-language forms. |
|
IM-3 |
Report |
Update portal service descriptions |
Objective: To migrate the service descriptions into the prototype New Zealand Government Portal. Description: The Portal team will update its descriptions from the Services List database. Activities:
|
Portal project team |
|
Task ID |
Task Type |
Task |
Description |
Team |
Reference to templates |
|
IM-4 |
Report |
Test "ease of search and find" |
Objective: Ensure that the service information in the Portal is actually as useful and logically presented as it is intended to be. Description: The EGU project team will develop a series of tests for checking whether the information contained in the portal correctly represents the services being searched for through the Portal by end users (service users and stakeholders). Activities:
|
EGU project team; Portal project team; Agency |
|
|
IM-5 |
Report |
Establish process for maintaining service descriptions |
Objective: To ensure that the services data within the New Zealand Government Portal maintains its currency and accuracy. Description: The EGU project team will work with the agencies to define and agree a process where the agency will monitor and maintain the currency of its service level descriptions. Activities:
|
Agency project team |
Generic maintenance process document |
[ Previous | Next ]

